Asherah

porygon2:

Yahweh had a wife who was edited out of holy books

jonathan-cunningham:

“You might know him as Yahweh, Allah or God. But on this fact, Jews, Muslims and Christians, the people of the great Abrahamic religions, are agreed: There is only one of Him,” writes Stavrakopoulou in a statement released to the British media. “He is a solitary figure, a single, universal creator, not one God among many … or so we like to believe.”

“After years of research specializing in the history and religion of Israel, however, I have come to a colorful and what could seem, to some, uncomfortable conclusion that God had a wife,” she added.

Stavrakopoulou bases her theory on ancient texts, amulets and figurines unearthed primarily in the ancient Canaanite coastal city called Ugarit, now modern-day Syria. All of these artifacts reveal that Asherah was a powerful fertility goddess.

Asherah’s connection to Yahweh, according to Stavrakopoulou, is spelled out in both the Bible and an 8th century B.C. inscription on pottery found in the Sinai desert at a site called Kuntillet Ajrud.

“The inscription is a petition for a blessing,” she shares. “Crucially, the inscription asks for a blessing from ‘Yahweh and his Asherah.’ Here was evidence that presented Yahweh and Asherah as a divine pair. And now a handful of similar inscriptions have since been found, all of which help to strengthen the case that the God of the Bible once had a wife.”

Also significant, Stavrakopoulou believes, “is the Bible’s admission that the goddess Asherah was worshiped in Yahweh’s Temple in Jerusalem. In the Book of Kings, we’re told that a statue of Asherah was housed in the temple and that female temple personnel wove ritual textiles for her.”

J. Edward Wright, president of both The Arizona Center for Judaic Studies and The Albright Institute for Archaeological Research, told Discovery News that he agrees several Hebrew inscriptions mention “Yahweh and his Asherah.”

“Asherah was not entirely edited out of the Bible by its male editors,” he added. “Traces of her remain, and based on those traces, archaeological evidence and references to her in texts from nations bordering Israel and Judah, we can reconstruct her role in the religions of the Southern Levant.”

This blows my mind.  Three of the largest religious traditions in the world have erased the female counterpart of their God.  These are the same religions often accused of passing memetic sexism to their adherents- I don’t think this is at all a coincidence. 

Arabic is a language that seriously likes to muck about with gender, especially since it only has two:

1) Masculine Haqeeqi, used for things that are alive and male, e.g. humans, animals. 

2) Masculine Majazi, masculine gender ascribed to objects, or things that are beyond human/animal, e.g. door, angel.

But then you can use hiya (she/it) to refer to God instead of huwa (he/it). There’s rules for ascribing feminine gender to objects: 

a) female by nature, i.e. mother, or daughter. are feminine. 

b) Ends with ta marbuta.

c) Ends with Alif Mamduda

d) Object occurs in pairs, e.g. eyes, legs.

“Allah” is none of these things, so has to be ascribed masculine gender of (2), unreal. So that’s why ‘huwa’ is used for God. Limiting, but what did I tell you, MUCK ABOUT WITH GENDER.

Things in Bible != Things in Qur’an, ok? ok.

That said, this is an interesting, does anyone have followup links? Something like it MUST have generated controversy somewhere.

Notes

  1. thetimeforgutsandguil reblogged this from iuwaehfoaiuwhefoiaulfjqn
  2. iuwaehfoaiuwhefoiaulfjqn reblogged this from iuwaehfoaiuwhefoiaulfjqn and added:
    I wanna see purists ALL over this shit. But then again, what’s the fucking likelihood, with all the misogyny and sexism.
  3. proudgrrrl reblogged this from shakethecobwebs
  4. shinyhings reblogged this from theangryblack
  5. kenyabenyagurl reblogged this from theangryblack
  6. chelebelleslair reblogged this from theangryblack
  7. graphic-content reblogged this from theangryblack
  8. theangryblack reblogged this from zesticola and added:
    Kinda surprised this isn’t well known. But then, this is what I studied in college, not what I learned in Sunday School...
  9. cricks reblogged this from skywritingg and added:
    Oh Abrahamic religions are ridden with instances like this. Ever heard of Lilith?
  10. skywritingg reblogged this from iuwaehfoaiuwhefoiaulfjqn
  11. darujericho reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham
  12. justpyro reblogged this from kaidraws and added:
    I just find that COOL.
  13. seanscheidt reblogged this from gurlfawkes and added:
    This is out of character for early Judaism because Asherah wasnt seen as a companion. From what I recall Asherah is...
  14. gurlfawkes reblogged this from darcyoh and added:
    Aside for the existence of a female companion, and the subsequent editing out of the female, what I think is really...
  15. ohalright reblogged this from horizonontheline and added:
    This would be so fascinating!!
  16. luxuryailments reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    Haha, not surprised. Salma Hayek called something like it in Dogma, remember? ;)
  17. itsaspaceship reblogged this from awhiterain
  18. dia-dhuit reblogged this from bubonickitten
  19. bulletinaweave reblogged this from bubonickitten and added:
    lol - uh, yeah, basically what I got out of that was: some people in the Judeo-Christian faith may or may not believe...
  20. note-a-bear reblogged this from bubonickitten
  21. bubonickitten reblogged this from ndelphinus
  22. darcyoh reblogged this from bezdan
  23. jonathan-cunningham posted this
Top of Page